Thursday, September 30, 2010

The Spectacle of the Tortured Body and the Torturer

In traditional images of tortured bodies in the U.S., the focus of the image is the person or group of people being abused. In her article “A Strange and Bitter Crop: the Spectacle of Torture”, Hazel Carby talks about the spectacle, or event, that is often created surround the torturing of certain bodies in the U.S. history. Specifically, bodies of color such as the lynched African Americans and Iraqi’s in the Abu Ghraib scandal were photographed and served several purposes as a spectacle for the nation. Perhaps most importantly, Carby talks about America’s “two faces”. One face wants to portray our country and its citizens as wholesome and caring, while the other face is carrying on these torturous practices over and over again throughout history.

Along the same lines as the lynching of African Americans in the early 20th century, the Ku Klux Klan was a powerful group of white supremacists with a deep history and even a current-day presence. In the 1920’s, the KKK was allied with many members of the U.S. government. Governors and policemen in the South gave KKK members permission and special allowances to taunt, beat, and kill African Americans. Because of the legacy of African Americans being seen as “foreign” bodies, the local government found it normal to go along with these practices. As the KKK re-emerged in the 1960’s, the U.S. government had a much different view of their activities. They regarded their practices as cruelty and punished those breaking laws with their actions against African Americans. This fits how Carby describes our country’s “historical amnesia” – forgetting past importance and treatment of African Americans in building our country.


Another important aspect of the visual culture of the KKK is the construction of their identity through their Klansmen outfits. As pictured below, the Klansmen wear an oversized gown with a large hood that covers their entire face with small eye holes. This simple outfit speaks volumes about bodies, power, and spectacle. The robe is large and ambiguous enough to take away most of the shape of the body wearing it. The person underneath could be of any gender, race, or class. We know from history that this was not the case, but it is interesting to note that these people who were torturing based on appearances and hiding their own. As apparent in the picture below of the child, the KKK mentality was started early on and was passed down through generations. This is just one of the many ridiculous “traditions” within U.S. culture.

One of the most defining and identifying parts of the KKK outfit is the hood. The hood covers so much of the face that it hides any kind of emotions the member might be displaying. In class we discussed that one way of defining humanity is through the face. We regard people with a human face as humans because of the emotions that are shown using facial expressions and movements. The Klansmen suppress these emotions and cover their faces as a way of removing themselves from the act. While the pictures of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib showed them with bags over their heads to dehumanize them as a degrading technique, the KKK members dehumanize themselves and stand as an institution rather than individuals. The costume acts as a way of making the attackers seem to be un-human without a face and without a body. This lack of a body was a tactic used to make it seem like an organization larger than the sum of its parts was against anyone who is not the “ideal” white body.



3 comments:

  1. The points you bring up in this blog about “the hood” and “costumes” with torture are so interesting! I found myself reading your argument and hoping that you would acknowledge the way the KKK used hoods as a torturer, in relation to the use of the hood on the tortured at Abu Ghraib. I find myself remembering Foucault’s argument on biopower, and how in some instances the body is no longer individual, but rather one large body encompassing many (with multiple heads). This loss of personal identity by the torturer is absolutely terrifying, because it opens the doors for a mindless population brainwashed on the ideals of “one” individual body controlling many.

    And although hoods were used by the torturer (with the KKK) and with the tortured (Abu Ghraib), one main visual difference is apparent: eye holes. The KKK torturers had holes cut out to enable visibility, whereas those who were tortured were still denied “the right to look”. This literally proves the “power” that’s established with the actual enabling of vision, and just goes to emphasis that even though KKK members could see, their vision was also being controlled by a greater ideal of racism.

    Great stuff! Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like your suggestion that the photographs serve as a "spectacle for the nation." I think that is a fantastic way of putting it- creating a solution for our question asked in class about who the photographs intended audience was. I truly believe that the audience was intended for civilians. Another thing that really stood out to me was your analysis of the KKK uniform was. I really never thought about the the klansmen and how their identity was completely sheilded. This visual makes me think of the brown bags that were placed of the prisoners in Abu Ghraib. Interstingly enough- we discussed hat makes people human and despite the fact that the prisoners bodies are exposed we as audience members do not identify with just body parts. Someone made a comment that people identify with eyes, and the klansmen only display their eyes. After your blog entry I thought about how I do not consider klansmen as human because I cant see any other part of their face or body that displayed their emotion. So ive concluded that you need to see someone entire self to count them as human.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how in your article you draw, similar to Hazel Carby, parallels between Abu Ghraib and America’s racist past. I really like how you mention that local governments, back in the day, used to support the violence and torture of bodies by giving support to the KKK. It reminds me of how the government today is funding the prisons over in Iran and Iraq, and therefore funding the torture that goes on in them. Good blog.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.