Thursday, September 30, 2010

The Scandal Was That It's Not That Scandalous

In 2004, photos of torture and abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq became public. With this outing came lots of reactions. Many people were outraged and many Americans were embarrassed that people from their civilized country could behave in such a grotesque manner – not only in the active torture but also in the documenting of it. People were surprised that pictures were taken and that it was made out to be such a spectacle for the cameras. People were shocked the torturers seemed to be having so much fun in the images. And even though all this shock and outrage is certainly well founded, it really should not have been as surprising as it was.

Hazel Carby’s article “A Strange and Bitter Crop: The Spectacle of Torture” takes a look at why the fact that Americans torture and show others should not be so astounding. In the article she writes, “the taking of photographs and videos, the preservation and the circulation of the visual image of the tortured/lynched body, the erotic sexual exploitation which produced pleasures in the torturers – all these practices are continuities in the history of American racism” (Carby). See, it is/was not an uncommon occurrence for the torture or lynching of non-white bodies. And with this torture and lynching comes the documentation and displaying of it. Carby goes on to say that “[t]here were almost 5,000 documented instances of lynching in the United States between post-civil was ‘reconstruction’ and the mid 20th century… The photographs of these bodies were not designed merely for storage, but rather functioned as public documents” (Carby). The images of these lynched bodies were used as postcards, as advertisements, as part of portfolios for photographers. A public spectacle was absolutely made out of these events. So it should not be astonishing when Americans today act like they did in the past.

I was looking around the internet for information on lynching and torture done by Americans and I came across this great cartoon:

Now when we take a look at this cartoon, we can see a lot of things going on. We see a middle aged, large white man with the words “USA, World Cop” written across his suit. He is holding a noose that is attached to a tree with the name “Iran” written on it. We also see another man behind the large white man. This figure is hooded and has “Southern Justice” written across his chest. His dress is eerily similar to what a member of the Ku Klux Klan would wear. Behind the hooded character is another tree with a three nooses hanging from it. In front of this tree is a sign that reads “Keep Out: White Tree.”

This cartoon visually shows exactly what Hazel Carby was talking about in her article. The past of America’s racism and violence towards non-white bodies is nicely illustrated by the hooded figure and the background tree. America’s current racism and violence toward non-white bodies is depicted nicely through the large white man and the Iran tree. [Editor’s note: I know Iran and Iraq are different places with different problems, but we started a war with both places and I’d place a bet that what happened in Abu Ghraib happens in Iran too.] The two figures are interacting quite nicely. In fact, the large white man seems to be letting the hooded figure in on a “joke” he’s playing. And just as there’s a relationship between the two figures in the cartoon, there is also a real life relationship between what the two are representing.

(Image Courtesy of: http://blogs.newamericamedia.org/bendib/817/the-lynching-of-iran)

4 comments:

  1. The cartoon you present in this blog as visual media is shocking and yet very telling to (as you insist) Carby’s argument. I wonder how in relating this cartoon to lynching photos, and thus to the pictures at Abu Ghraib would present a different argument when we look at the intended audiences for all of the mediums. The lynching photographs were intended as “postcard” events to be circulated around the community, and also as “warnings”, stating to non-white bodies that they better not act out, or else. I can thus see the pictures at Abu Ghraib also becoming a warning to non-white bodies (in particular those of whom the U.S. is at war with), which is a similar message that is clearly stated in the cartoon. The angle I’d like to investigate however is audience. What publication was the cartoon illustrated for? A newspaper, a magazine, a blog, a publication that leans “more left” or “more right”, etc.? In knowing the medium of the cartoon could help better flesh-out the bias represented by image. Who is looking at this cartoon, what audience is granted the privilege to look? What's interesting is that "the warning" could be shown not to those who should be warned, but rather a reader who is in the population of the supremacy. This in effect can cause a community that either rallies and agree to warn, or an counterculture that rallies in protest.

    This blog is a great discussion starter! Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I absolutely agree with you that this cartoon exemplifies the points Carby makes. What is terrifying to me is the fact that it *was* so commonplace for people to see such blatant acts of cruelty and racism, and yet they are shocked today when such things are acted out.

    I think that what some people choose to ignore is the fact that in basic training, our soldiers are given lessons that instill racism against those people who are brown-bodied. Yesterday I told you all about my cousin in the military; he explained to me once that basic training begins with a series of videos of the "enemy," but that most of the images in those videos are not of Iraqi soldiers. They are of women and children, and they are of everyday workers. We cannot expect our soldiers to come out of that without a feeling of hatred for the people of the nations they are stationed in. In that light, I feel that you are right. There should be no scandal, because we should not be surprised that they would perform the same kinds of racist acts against these bodies as the KKK did to those bodies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very nice blog. I appreciate how it has furthered Hazel Carby's argument that this kind of spectacle-torture is an historical part of American life and turned a critical eye not only on the torturers, but also on the naive Americans who were so taken aback by these practices.

    While it doesn't surprise me in the least, it does scare me that these are practices which are frequently taught to our soldiers by high ranking military personnel.

    Also, while it makes no difference to your argument, Hazel Carby is female.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I totally brain-farted on the gender pronouns... thanks for pointing that out. It's fixed now.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.